specific learning disabilities
Definition
The Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) defines a specific learning disability as “a disorder in one or more of the basic psychological processes involved in understanding or in using language, spoken or written, that may manifest itself in the imperfect ability to listen, think, speak, read, write, spell, or to do mathematical calculations.” This disability category includes such conditions as perceptual disabilities, brain injury, minimal brain dysfunction, dyslexia and developmental aphasia (a type of language disorder).
However, as IDEA’s definition notes, “Specific Learning Disability does not include learning problems that are primarily the result of visual, hearing, or motor disabilities; of intellectual disability; of emotional disturbance; or of environmental, cultural, or economic disadvantage.” This clause helps to distinguish learning disabilities from the other disability categories specified by IDEA. Specific Learning Disabilities (SLD) is by far the largest category of disability within the Individuals for Disabilities Education Act. Nearly half of all disabled children are labeled in the category of SLD.
Common Traits
According to the National Dissemination Center for Children with Disabilities (known as NICHCY), specific learning disabilities commonly affect skills in the areas of:
Reading (called dyslexia) Writing (called dysgraphia) Listening Speaking Reasoning Math (called dyscalculia)Signs that a child might have a learning disability tend to appear in elementary school. For example, difficulty learning the alphabet, problems with following directions, trouble transforming thoughts into written words and misreading math problems are all possible indicators of a specific learning disability.
Educational ChallengesIt’s clear from reading the above traits that students with learning disabilities can face a number of educational challenges. Oklahoma’s State Department of Education alludes to several of these challenges in their online fact sheet on specific learning disabilities; they include:
Difficulty reading out loud Poor reading comprehension Struggling to write papers and essays Trouble understanding lectures Difficulty holding a pencil
Tips for Teachers and Parents
Don’t let the term “learning disabilities” mislead you, teachers and parents. Rooted within this term is a common assumption that children with learning disabilities can’t learn. NICHCY proposes otherwise, stating, “Children with learning disabilities are not ‘dumb’ or ‘lazy.’ In fact, they usually have average or above average intelligence. Their brains just process information differently.”
Indeed, the more politically-correct phrase “learning differences” offers a more accurate snapshot that captures the essence of learning disabilities. Supplied with the appropriate special education services, students with learning disabilities can flourish academically. Take a student with dysgraphia for example. He or she may have A-worthy ideas for a paper inside his or her head, but without accommodations those ideas will probably not earn the grade they deserve. One potential accommodation for such a scenario entails using speech-to-text technology to write papers.
Overall, the best educational accommodations for students with specific learning disabilities stem from assessing a child’s particular case and identifying his or her strengths and weaknesses. This evaluation is worked into the individualized education program (IEP) process.
Parents, are you concerned that your youngster might possess a learning disability? NICHCY notes you can ask your school to evaluate your son or daughter to diagnosis any learning disabilities. If your child has a specific learning disability, the IEP process will begin to unfold.
Please review the Digest of Education Statistics provide by the IES (The Institute of Education Sciences) who is directly associated with and reports data to the U.S. Department of Education. The data reports that 209, 813 out of 392, 200 children (2011-2012)ages 14-21 were classified as children with Specific leaning Disabilities. That leaves 182, 387 children requiring special education teachers and aids who are highly qualified to work with children with Autism, emotion disturbance,traumatic brain injury, visual impairment,orthopedic impairment, hearing impairment, intellectual impairment, speech and language impairment, visual impairment, deaf-blindness, multiple disabilities, hearing impairment and complex family structures. (Source: IES -NCES Table 219.90 Digest of Education Statistics) See Attachment: PDF-IES.PDF
The push to transition the disable community (often disregarding IEp's) into the main stream classrooms is seen as positive direction in complying with federal and state statues and saving school district money. But, we now see schools using these statues to cut back services, rename classroom settings and forcing some children unprepared to deal with main stream children being put at risk and pressure placed on untrained teachers to deal with special need children. It's a poor decision, ignores common sense, detracts from the real intent or reasoning behind Leave No Child Behind and has a undesirable by-product of dumbing down main stream classrooms. It adds one very disturbing impact on teachers - if they are not trained in dealing with special needs children, their classrooms become war zones or at least a constant disruptive learning environment.